<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is hotel wireless Internet safe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2008/is-hotel-wireless-internet-safe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2008/is-hotel-wireless-internet-safe/</link>
	<description>Jake on travel, China, food, life and tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McShane</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2008/is-hotel-wireless-internet-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-22675</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McShane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2008/is-hotel-wireless-internet-safe/#comment-22675</guid>
		<description>I always use my company VPN and like Jake, I remote desktops into my pc&#039;s at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always use my company VPN and like Jake, I remote desktops into my pc&#8217;s at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David's InnerGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2008/is-hotel-wireless-internet-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-22674</link>
		<dc:creator>David's InnerGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2008/is-hotel-wireless-internet-safe/#comment-22674</guid>
		<description>I just returned from a weekend trip to Los Angeles, and I used my favorite solution for hotel wifi: I took along my wireless router (actually, my old 802.11g router that I keep as a backup.) My home wifi network settings are already configured into the router. Just plug it into the available ethernet port and PRESTO! Wifi as secure as when you are at home. When I&#039;m out of the room or not online, I power off the router, so that no snoopers will see the signal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just returned from a weekend trip to Los Angeles, and I used my favorite solution for hotel wifi: I took along my wireless router (actually, my old 802.11g router that I keep as a backup.) My home wifi network settings are already configured into the router. Just plug it into the available ethernet port and PRESTO! Wifi as secure as when you are at home. When I&#8217;m out of the room or not online, I power off the router, so that no snoopers will see the signal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Bruner</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2008/is-hotel-wireless-internet-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-22673</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Bruner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2008/is-hotel-wireless-internet-safe/#comment-22673</guid>
		<description>I have used Juno (United Online) since 2001. It is encrypted until I view it on my HDD. It basically operates on POP3. I would like to think it&#039;s sufficient, but perhaps you have more convincing &quot;other ideas&quot;. I have continued to use it for its POP3, but also because - for $9.95/year (US) - it allows me to keep one address so I don&#039;t lose contacts.
It also allows me a small, but significant ability to include graphics in my messages - nothing elaborate, but sufficiently improved over other services like Yahoo, etc..
If I&#039;m wrong, I&#039;d certainly like to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Juno (United Online) since 2001. It is encrypted until I view it on my HDD. It basically operates on POP3. I would like to think it&#8217;s sufficient, but perhaps you have more convincing &#8220;other ideas&#8221;. I have continued to use it for its POP3, but also because &#8211; for $9.95/year (US) &#8211; it allows me to keep one address so I don&#8217;t lose contacts.<br />
It also allows me a small, but significant ability to include graphics in my messages &#8211; nothing elaborate, but sufficiently improved over other services like Yahoo, etc..<br />
If I&#8217;m wrong, I&#8217;d certainly like to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

