<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advertising is NOT a Search Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2007/advertising-is-not-a-search-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2007/advertising-is-not-a-search-feature/</link>
	<description>Jake on travel, China, food, life and tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Ludington - Mediablab: Published items (items 1 to 50)</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2007/advertising-is-not-a-search-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-6785</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Ludington - Mediablab: Published items (items 1 to 50)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2007/advertising-is-not-a-search-feature/#comment-6785</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Advertising is NOT a Search Feature   &#160; [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Advertising is NOT a Search Feature   &nbsp; [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2007/advertising-is-not-a-search-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-6342</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2007/advertising-is-not-a-search-feature/#comment-6342</guid>
		<description>@Brandon Furwangler: I didn&#039;t write about Yahoo&#039;s new search engine, which is darned close to matching the results of Google in quality. Yahoo is moving search forward. Ask has more useful results - Ask is moving search forward. Live.com has continued to offer sub-par results. I see more hope in a new company coming from nowhere to challenge Google than Live.com fixing all the problems they have with quality search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brandon Furwangler: I didn&#8217;t write about Yahoo&#8217;s new search engine, which is darned close to matching the results of Google in quality. Yahoo is moving search forward. Ask has more useful results &#8211; Ask is moving search forward. Live.com has continued to offer sub-par results. I see more hope in a new company coming from nowhere to challenge Google than Live.com fixing all the problems they have with quality search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Furtwangler</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2007/advertising-is-not-a-search-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-6341</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Furtwangler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2007/advertising-is-not-a-search-feature/#comment-6341</guid>
		<description>So...it&#039;s not yet as good as the #1 search engine, therefore they should pack up and go home.  Good logic.

The new results do seem better than before and I like the new Shopping features.

Aren&#039;t you in favor of more competition in the search buisness?  They&#039;re making improvements, this moves the industry forward, you get to rant (more money), all is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;it&#8217;s not yet as good as the #1 search engine, therefore they should pack up and go home.  Good logic.</p>
<p>The new results do seem better than before and I like the new Shopping features.</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t you in favor of more competition in the search buisness?  They&#8217;re making improvements, this moves the industry forward, you get to rant (more money), all is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Ludingtonâ€™s Digital Lifestyle</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2007/advertising-is-not-a-search-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-6384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Ludingtonâ€™s Digital Lifestyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakeludington.com/life/2007/advertising-is-not-a-search-feature/#comment-6384</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Recent Discussion   Rob Lindsey: You might want to wait a... Jake Ludingtonâ€™s Digital Lifestyle: Recent Discussion Jake Ludingtonâ€™s... Jake Ludingtonâ€™s Digital Lifestyle:Recent Discussion Jake: @Brandon...Jake Ludingtonâ€™s Digital Lifestyle: Recent Discussion Jake: @Brandon... peter degraaf: iâ€™m relieved that Ian is still... Jake: @Brandon Furwangler: I didnâ€™t write about... Brandon Furtwangler:&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Recent Discussion   Rob Lindsey: You might want to wait a&#8230; Jake Ludingtonâ€™s Digital Lifestyle: Recent Discussion Jake Ludingtonâ€™s&#8230; Jake Ludingtonâ€™s Digital Lifestyle:Recent Discussion Jake: @Brandon&#8230;Jake Ludingtonâ€™s Digital Lifestyle: Recent Discussion Jake: @Brandon&#8230; peter degraaf: iâ€™m relieved that Ian is still&#8230; Jake: @Brandon Furwangler: I didnâ€™t write about&#8230; Brandon Furtwangler:<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

